Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: An Updated Metaanalysis of Randomized Control Trials
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: There is ongoing debate regarding the usefulness of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study aimed to analyze all randomized control trials published including most recent one.
منابع مشابه
Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE Recent randomized trials comparing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) have produced conflicting results. The role of TLH in women suitable for VH remains uncertain. STUDY DESIGN This study was a metaanalysis of randomized studies comparing TLH and VH for benign disease. Pooled outcome measures (odds ratio [OR] and weighted mean difference [WMD]) were...
متن کاملLaparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.
OBJECTIVE To compare open appendectomy (OA) with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for length of the operation, complications, postoperative pain control, length of hospitalization, postdischarge recovery time, and hospital charges. DESIGN Prospective randomized clinical trial of patients with acute appendicitis. SETTING Tertiary care, urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS A population-based sam...
متن کاملThe influence of dietary and nondietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure: an updated metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
We updated our previous systematic review of the effect of supplemental calcium on blood pressure. We extended our previous searches on MEDLINE and EMBASE to May 1997 and examined citations from relevant articles. We contacted the authors of eligible trials to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data, and to identify unpublished trials. We included any study in which investigators randomize...
متن کاملLaparoscopic VS open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
AIM To perform a meta-analysis on laparoscopic hepatectomy VS conventional liver resection for treating hepatolithiasis. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, and undertook a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy VS conventional open liver resection for local hepatolithiasis in the lef...
متن کاملLaparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: An updated meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE To compare laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) with open hepatic resection (OHR) for benign and malignant tumors. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 1, 1998, and May 1, 2009. STUDY SELECTION Studies clearly documenting a comparison of LHR with OHR for benign and malignant neoplasms were selected. DATA...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Hpb
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1365-182X', '1477-2574']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.069